1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

[Civilization] Disarming

Discussion in 'Archive (Suggestion and Feedback)' started by BookerTheGeek, Jan 26, 2016.

?

Should we disable disarming?

Poll closed Feb 2, 2016.
  1. Yes

    47.4%
  2. No

    52.6%
  1. BookerTheGeek

    BookerTheGeek Patron Tier 3

    Messages:
    3,257
    Likes Received:
    1,097
    Local Time:
    10:18 PM
    With the mods currently in the pack, along with those being added in the futare, we have the ability to disarm other players.

    This disarming can remove held items and armour, but not inventory.

    This is good for pvp allowing you to remove some of the advantage of top tier pvp'rs.

    Bad thing is you can loose your soul bound armour or items.

    Votes without comments don't count. We need to know why you want it that way.
     
  2. johnfg10

    johnfg10 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,430
    Likes Received:
    200
    Local Time:
    4:18 AM
    because i work hard for my armor i dont want some "new player" to make this and me be defence less
     
  3. tyler489

    tyler489 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,873
    Likes Received:
    202
    Local Time:
    10:18 PM
    No because its not that hard to get the disarming spell.
    also can we make it where u cant disarm in claims?
     
  4. Rubijox

    Rubijox Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    548
    Likes Received:
    45
    Local Time:
    11:18 PM
    in my opinion, as soon as there is the risk of losing/destroying other people's stuff its a no
     
  5. Arcanuo

    Arcanuo Old School Poster

    Messages:
    424
    Likes Received:
    160
    Local Time:
    11:18 PM
    It's not a PvP focused pack. I get that, but disabling something everytime someone whines? What will we have left eventually?
     
  6. johnfg10

    johnfg10 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,430
    Likes Received:
    200
    Local Time:
    4:18 AM
    i dotn mind pvp but someone coming in taking my stuff and killing me is unfair
     
  7. Dat_Doc

    Dat_Doc Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    52
    Likes Received:
    4
    Local Time:
    5:18 AM
    If that could be fixed, it can stay. But otherwise pls remove it
     
  8. Dovahpork

    Dovahpork Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    227
    Likes Received:
    25
    Local Time:
    4:18 AM
    well to be fair it would teach people not to randomly attack other people
    by having disarm you could stop an unprovoked attack without having to stand there and die
     
  9. johnfg10

    johnfg10 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,430
    Likes Received:
    200
    Local Time:
    4:18 AM
    or it will be used to attack someone take there armor remove there weapons and leave them defenceless ye seems fair to me( im being sarcastic btw)
     
  10. Dovahpork

    Dovahpork Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    227
    Likes Received:
    25
    Local Time:
    4:18 AM
    so just make it a rule to not disarm people in claims then
     
  11. johnfg10

    johnfg10 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,430
    Likes Received:
    200
    Local Time:
    4:18 AM
    or just remove it if someone attacks you in the wild and i lose my stuff i cant defend myself unfair
     
  12. Dovahpork

    Dovahpork Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    227
    Likes Received:
    25
    Local Time:
    4:18 AM
    same can be said for any one shot wep
     
  13. johnfg10

    johnfg10 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,430
    Likes Received:
    200
    Local Time:
    4:18 AM
    who has a one shot wep ?[DOUBLEPOST=1453843893][/DOUBLEPOST]this is done ? @BookerTheGeek so its getting removed?
     
    Last edited: Jan 26, 2016
  14. BookerTheGeek

    BookerTheGeek Patron Tier 3

    Messages:
    3,257
    Likes Received:
    1,097
    Local Time:
    10:18 PM
    That depends on the poll after 7 days.
     
  15. Arcanuo

    Arcanuo Old School Poster

    Messages:
    424
    Likes Received:
    160
    Local Time:
    11:18 PM
    My issue is every time someone has an issue with something it's removed. While sometimes X being removed is valid, it's still a cause for concern. There are of course some rituals like eternal nite that require a nerf, but at this pace Witchery and several mods might as well be removed. If player x had issues with feature y.
     
    Last edited: Jan 26, 2016
  16. Dovahpork

    Dovahpork Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    227
    Likes Received:
    25
    Local Time:
    4:18 AM
    so what happends to werewolfs then
    as when they are attacking they can destroy armor
     
  17. johnfg10

    johnfg10 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,430
    Likes Received:
    200
    Local Time:
    4:18 AM
    ok @BookerTheGeek can someone keep stuff they took out of your inv?
     
  18. MoltairTremox

    MoltairTremox Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    17
    Local Time:
    9:18 PM
    I would say to not disable it, maybe applying the following, allowing disabled in your claim, however you can disable (without taking away) items in someone elses claim, in that way there would be a little bit of control over it.
     
  19. BookerTheGeek

    BookerTheGeek Patron Tier 3

    Messages:
    3,257
    Likes Received:
    1,097
    Local Time:
    10:18 PM
    Witchery is hard to configure due to minimal configs. Abilities in regards to werewolves and vampires also hard to control.

    As to people having issues, this is why we have forum polls. I would ask that you all check back regularly (every couple days) for new polls or rule updates.

    It would also be nice if you could inform the players in game of these polls and ask them to come give their opinions as this is a community driven pack. We need the community to come give their input.
     
  20. joices

    joices Patron Tier 3

    Messages:
    300
    Likes Received:
    86
    Local Time:
    10:18 PM
    It should be disabled. The armor/weapons of a player with a much higher advantage should be won by the death of them, not because that other guy had magic.
     

Share This Page