Done Updating our protections

Dieses Thema im Forum "Civilization" wurde erstellt von LordFungi, 21. Februar 2016.

Status des Themas:
Es sind keine weiteren Antworten möglich.
  1. LordFungi

    LordFungi Patron Tier 1

    Beiträge:
    313
    Zustimmungen:
    92
    Ortszeit:
    02:08
    There needs to be a discussion on items that should be able to be used and what items shouldn't on this very unique server of ours. Claim protections have a variety of items that people aren't allowed to use in and around another's claim that may not make sense. The Thaumcraft wand is negotiable, but let me start off our list of items we think should be allowed (or not allowed) in claims, and please give your reason why.

    The flamethrower from Mekanism is harmless. as I've been told it can melt sand into glass and other things like that, but I have never seen this in my time of using it even before the last reset. However you are not allowed to use it near claims, even though its been rendered a purely offensive weapon.
     
  2. King_Cronus

    King_Cronus Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    842
    Zustimmungen:
    47
    Ortszeit:
    10:08
    Honestly allow killing in claims but. No grave robbing allowing people to use all weapons
     
  3. LordFungi

    LordFungi Patron Tier 1

    Beiträge:
    313
    Zustimmungen:
    92
    Ortszeit:
    02:08
    Bossly.. thats been allowed for a long time. This is a discussion about items not people. If you don't have a item to suggest don't reply.
     
  4. King_Cronus

    King_Cronus Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    842
    Zustimmungen:
    47
    Ortszeit:
    10:08
    Allow all items than I see no problem
     
  5. Emberlore

    Emberlore Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    5
    Zustimmungen:
    0
    Ortszeit:
    11:08
    I believe the Equal Trade foci will ignore the protection. Still not seeing any problem?
     
  6. LordFungi

    LordFungi Patron Tier 1

    Beiträge:
    313
    Zustimmungen:
    92
    Ortszeit:
    02:08
    Keep your replies to the thread as suggestions.
     
  7. King_Cronus

    King_Cronus Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    842
    Zustimmungen:
    47
    Ortszeit:
    10:08
    Well in terms of destroying stuff yes
     
  8. MrWisski

    MrWisski Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    1.110
    Zustimmungen:
    522
    Ortszeit:
    05:08
    We do not prohibit items in/around claims because we are mean, we don't like you, or we want to ruin your gameplay.

    We prohibit items in/around claims because they have the potential to bypass and grief a claim in a way that has a large impact, but because these items are still usefull, and desired, we restrict thier usage, rather than ban them outright.

    Our restrictions are global - they are the same regardless of modpack, so IF we have a server running a version of a mod that an item is exploitable on, it will be restricted on ALL servers. Only when ALL versions of an item lack the exploit that caused it to be restricted will we even consider removing it from the restrictions.
     
    alven4, johnfg10, Jun_ und 2 anderen gefällt das.
  9. johnfg10

    johnfg10 Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    2.430
    Zustimmungen:
    200
    Ortszeit:
    10:08
    if we hope hard enought then mithion will keep up his work on griefguard as this will allow you to take your wand foci onto claims and the only diffrence is it will not break anything(in theory)
    griefguard | MineYourMind Community
     
  10. IsaacOB1

    IsaacOB1 Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    115
    Zustimmungen:
    5
    Ortszeit:
    10:08
    Yea but like slind said in another post the current system covers alot more and it would also take alot of integration to add new system :p
     
  11. johnfg10

    johnfg10 Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    2.430
    Zustimmungen:
    200
    Ortszeit:
    10:08
    i was nto suggesting we replace it and i was talking to someone who came up with the idea of makeing grief guard claims work when a plugin claim is made meaning you get the benifits with out drawbacks
     
  12. IsaacOB1

    IsaacOB1 Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    115
    Zustimmungen:
    5
    Ortszeit:
    10:08
    ah okay i guess i mean it would be good to stop as many claim bypasses as possible
     
  13. johnfg10

    johnfg10 Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    2.430
    Zustimmungen:
    200
    Ortszeit:
    10:08
    no i mean if this was done you could take for say a wand and walk ontot someones claim and not break blocks with it as grief gaurd actuly stops the forge event from taking place
     
  14. IsaacOB1

    IsaacOB1 Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    115
    Zustimmungen:
    5
    Ortszeit:
    10:08
    ah okay that would be good
     
  15. johnfg10

    johnfg10 Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    2.430
    Zustimmungen:
    200
    Ortszeit:
    10:08
    cause that way you could attack people with your wand :D
     
  16. IsaacOB1

    IsaacOB1 Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    115
    Zustimmungen:
    5
    Ortszeit:
    10:08
    I know you would love that lol
     
  17. johnfg10

    johnfg10 Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    2.430
    Zustimmungen:
    200
    Ortszeit:
    10:08
    can this be closed or moved to suggestions as this is not a support issue and is finnished plz
     
Status des Themas:
Es sind keine weiteren Antworten möglich.

Diese Seite empfehlen