new server idea!!! Neko's Technomagical World

40 for yes vs 6 for no makes it that 91% of people who voted say yes. That's really good. that means that 9/10 players would play the pack. I would think that should be good enough to be concidered for a server

 

"go with the majority", in my opinion, would suggest somebody that doesn't care either way, who will probably dip into the pack a little if it were added to the server, whereas "no no no" would be anybody who would not play on this pack at all if it were added.

 

so then voting is complete what does the mym team say to the poll will they accept this pack as a mym server

 

anything above 40 is normally considered so
Also they wont just go yes or no, itll have to be reviewed put through the strenous testing process and then decided upon
You probably wont knoe for a while unless they already have a definitive answer

 

Man I'd love to get in on some of Reika's mods again, rotarycraft and reactorcraft are awesome in my opinion and its a shame not so many packs have them.

 

yea reika's mods are great but i wonder if any work has been done to the fission reactor as it used to have a tendency of corrupting worlds on the monster pack

 

I would love to play with rotarycraft since I never got the chance and I am not a single player guy hehe also monster was a 1.6 pack so I bet reika fix the the issue stated above with fission reactor "Hopefully"

 

What was the issue with it?

 

lag tons of lag. it was/is a server killer

 

hmm. i cant start a world. it get stuck on world generation. anyone know how to fix it?

 

i had to add more ram to my launcher before it would actually make a world[DOUBLEPOST=1464068027][/DOUBLEPOST]i have spoken to the modpack creator who is now aware of this issue might add


NekhsActive Member
New
Sorry! It's something that I'm still trying to sort out why.

Older versions USED to work, but it's been a WHILE since I've done much with it, and I'm planning on updating things Soon (tm) - a lot of work went into poking through the configs so I'll likely need to do more with that.

I'll look into it in greater detail, I've just been somewhat busy.

Thanks for bringing this to my attention!