Not Possible Forum gender equality

Dieses Thema im Forum "Archive (Suggestion and Feedback)" wurde erstellt von F4lconwings, 3. September 2016.

  1. F4lconwings

    F4lconwings Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    631
    Zustimmungen:
    264
    Ortszeit:
    07:18
    So, that post here made me get a quick think.
    Now the female ranks have 0 points.
    Before we get any complaints about that, why not split the achievement points from

    male 1
    female 0​

    to

    male 1/2
    female 1/2
    If possible. Would require to round the uneven numbers to their precursor/follower number, to make it an even thing.

    Endo
     
  2. chugga_fan

    chugga_fan ME 4M storage cell of knowledge, all the time

    Beiträge:
    5.861
    Zustimmungen:
    730
    Ortszeit:
    01:18
    I 100% hope this is a joke, either way it's the same thing
     
  3. LucidTheStick

    LucidTheStick Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    3.143
    Zustimmungen:
    1.327
    Ortszeit:
    01:18
    More work then its worth and unneeded.
     
    Mining_Canadian, Kazeodori und Kronnn gefällt das.
  4. F4lconwings

    F4lconwings Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    631
    Zustimmungen:
    264
    Ortszeit:
    07:18
    Oh lucid... it requires to change one parameter in the achievement files.
    Know you cant like me, but that answer is 100% unjustified.
     
  5. chugga_fan

    chugga_fan ME 4M storage cell of knowledge, all the time

    Beiträge:
    5.861
    Zustimmungen:
    730
    Ortszeit:
    01:18
    As is the question, there's no point in it, and it's useless, it's moreover a waste of time, seriously, what difference does it make?
     
  6. SirWill

    SirWill Founder

    Beiträge:
    12.284
    Zustimmungen:
    3.708
    Ortszeit:
    07:18
    I already tried this when I created them but you can't give 0,5 points so it is not possible.
     
  7. F4lconwings

    F4lconwings Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    631
    Zustimmungen:
    264
    Ortszeit:
    07:18
    Thats why i thought of going for the next higher/lower number :)
     
  8. Rohen

    Rohen The beemaster

    Beiträge:
    879
    Zustimmungen:
    170
    Ortszeit:
    07:18
    [​IMG]
    Seriously?
     
    Lawmonark gefällt das.
  9. F4lconwings

    F4lconwings Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    631
    Zustimmungen:
    264
    Ortszeit:
    07:18
    Just tried to be fair to both sides.
     
  10. SirWill

    SirWill Founder

    Beiträge:
    12.284
    Zustimmungen:
    3.708
    Ortszeit:
    07:18
    Then you got more points for lower titles then for higher titles.
     
  11. F4lconwings

    F4lconwings Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    631
    Zustimmungen:
    264
    Ortszeit:
    07:18
    Hmm, true.
     
  12. LucidTheStick

    LucidTheStick Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    3.143
    Zustimmungen:
    1.327
    Ortszeit:
    01:18
    I'm really not sure what you are referring to, but I'd be happy to continue discussing this perceived problem in private with you.
     

Diese Seite empfehlen