/tpahere permission request

It's not helping, considering both parties will still have to write a reply with commands.
./tpa ./tpaccept
./tpahere /tpaccept - it's the same thing basically, what's wrong with having just TPA if they both basically work the same?

There are disadvantages to having access to both, and you already have access to one.

 

I don't get why we need /tphere its is the same function as /tpa just that you are the one sending a request for a player to tp to you instead of them having to send you a request

 

Don't worry we like suggestion from the player base

But i don't think there is a real need to have 2 things that work the same as the other

 

The reason it can easily be abused is if I have flight I can easily just fly to world height and /tphere people to me and they fall to their death.

Also, I would hate to bring someone to my base and then have them die cause I moved from where I was and then they accept and now they are dead from withers.

 

For the fall to your death the plugin is Safe tp puts them on the ground

 

And if I am flying in the eldritch dimension?

 

./tpahere - dirt platform - shovel it - falling to death

 

Then that counts as a player trap Kinda, As it was set up for them to die.

 

Hence the abuse.[DOUBLEPOST=1433370786][/DOUBLEPOST]Also, what if I tp you to the boss fight of gaia? I did not kill you. Oops. Not my fault.

Thaumcraft boss fight, wither, enderdragon, chaos dragon, just to name a few.

 

this is why you don't accept when you aren't sure they are not going to be an ()&*(&&-98

 

Very easy for it to be abused + really not needed = I vote no.

 

+1

 

But it would be the same way with /tpa. You can easily "lure" someone it a trap when they want to teleport for you. Same thing actually. And while working in a team, /tpahere is easier to use. If A wants to go to B with /tpa you have to wait till the other one accepts, unsure when he will accept. With /tpahere, A can issue the command and B can accept the Teleport when he wants to.

And since someone already said that /tpahere and /tpa pretty much do the same, why not implement it? It wouldn't change much and you should always be careful with /tpaccept.

 

I see lots of reasons not to enable it. It's not too much trouble for players to wait for a tpa. The staff tickets from players killing other players via /tpahere I see being huge.

 

Same +1

 

Couldn't agreed any more.

 

If they accept they know there is a risk, ESPECIALLY if its not someone you know
As far as I see it if they will accept a /tpahere then going into chat and asking them to /tpa to you to lure and kill is the same thing
Adding the perms doesnt change anything other than making it easier

If you are worried about people thinking the chat /tpa and /tpahere are to similar you can make a custom coloured chat message to differentiate easily

 

I think that this should be a donor perk