[CIV] Market Restrictions

Dieses Thema im Forum "Archive (Suggestion and Feedback)" wurde erstellt von BookerTheGeek, 9. Februar 2016.

?

Market restrictions?

Diese Umfrage wurde geschlossen: 16. Februar 2016
  1. Yes

    42,9%
  2. No

    57,1%
  1. BookerTheGeek

    BookerTheGeek Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    3.257
    Zustimmungen:
    1.097
    Ortszeit:
    12:50
    It has been brought up that their might be a good reason to implement market restrictions on CIV.

    This thread is to determine if an End-Game Item list for market restrictions is wanted.

    As of right now, the only restriction on CIV is, (And regardless of this poll will always be):
    • Bees: Only world drop bees
    • Seeds: If it says agricraft on it, you can't sell it.
    As always we will leave this open for 7 days, and if you don't post why, I won't count your vote.




    No, I feel that we do not need a market restriction on CIV. I like the way that it is, and I dont see people flooding the market with super cheap items
     
  2. OldManPingu

    OldManPingu Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    87
    Zustimmungen:
    17
    Ortszeit:
    18:50
    My personal opinion on the matter, is that I feel restricting the market can be beneficial in a way as to avoid people reaching that end game stat, because I believe it should be a challenge, I understand people my disagree, however, simply my opinion
     
  3. AceOfBases

    AceOfBases CDO: OCD alphabetized as it ought to be.

    Beiträge:
    149
    Zustimmungen:
    39
    Ortszeit:
    10:50
    I've never understood the need to regulate how people enjoy the game. It's not a competition, so there's no unfair situation if someone wants to buy end game stuff and skip ahead. Nobody is harmed, except those that feel that their enjoyment was decreased because someone else didn't have to "work" as much as they did.

    It's a game, and the end goal of the server should be to accommodate people's play styles and game choices, if it doesn't create an unfair situation and nobody is harmed. I just don't see any harm, or real disadvantage other than perceived, to any other players if two people can arrive at an equitable trade of goods that both are happy with.
     
    CollinsToys und johnfg10 gefällt das.
  4. johnfg10

    johnfg10 Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    2.430
    Zustimmungen:
    200
    Ortszeit:
    18:50
    tbh its quite nice being able to put things on the mark et and having more stuff that is selleble will allow myms to flow between players more freely plus i dont know many people that under price goods as long as its not from thaum or botania where there is strick progression
     
  5. grav0r

    grav0r Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    72
    Zustimmungen:
    7
    Ortszeit:
    19:50
    In my opinion market restrictions just dont fit the theme of civilisation. For modpacks like this less rules = more fun.. in the end its pvp, if you are not ready for stuff you illegitimately obtain, there is a good chance to lose it again :)
     
  6. IsaacOB1

    IsaacOB1 Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    115
    Zustimmungen:
    5
    Ortszeit:
    18:50
    In my opinion I think that the market should be open to as many items including some end items as people selling earn money for there hard work and people buying have less work on there hands and everyone happy.
     
  7. Ernuke

    Ernuke Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    113
    Zustimmungen:
    32
    Ortszeit:
    14:50
    IMHO restrict some end-game items will allow player to actually continue the progress of some mods. Many(if not all) of the mods on Civ are based on progression, in creating things and earning them.

    As of right now, people can sell raw items to help the progression of such mods (bottled essentia, Living rock, Mekanism/Ender IO parts, clay botles and fumes rom witchery).

    But in the end, i'm not against a "free market", I just prefere a regulated one. :)
     
  8. julio1237878

    julio1237878 Game enthusiastic

    Beiträge:
    1.024
    Zustimmungen:
    144
    Ortszeit:
    10:50
    I am not against a free market i actually like the idea. I would't like to see the sell of endgame items at a ridiculous low price imo
     
  9. Arcanuo

    Arcanuo Old School Poster

    Beiträge:
    424
    Zustimmungen:
    160
    Ortszeit:
    13:50
    I simply wanted an endgame list because I was tired of being told what I couldn't trade. With the option though I prefer Open Market,no endgame list, without the market plugin. I would free a village where players can build shops, trade items instead of the market.
     
    johnfg10 gefällt das.
  10. Ernuke

    Ernuke Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    113
    Zustimmungen:
    32
    Ortszeit:
    14:50
    Actually... the idea of @Arcanuo is great :eek:
     
  11. Arcanuo

    Arcanuo Old School Poster

    Beiträge:
    424
    Zustimmungen:
    160
    Ortszeit:
    13:50
    Let me flesh it out a bit, one second.[DOUBLEPOST=1455027323][/DOUBLEPOST]Trade Village:

    An Admin claimed land deposit beside spawn, with multiple sub-claims that can be rented for X MyMs per week. A form of shop plugin that supports modded IDs woould needed. This area would also be a no PvP zone but only be accessible from spawn.

    Pros:

    - realistic
    - Allows the trading of high tier endgame items but balances it because they have to visit the market, and actually purchase or haggle.

    Cons:
    - Could run out of plots.
     
  12. tyler489

    tyler489 Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    1.873
    Zustimmungen:
    202
    Ortszeit:
    12:50
    \
    chest shop supports ids but not things like tinkers tools
     
  13. julio1237878

    julio1237878 Game enthusiastic

    Beiträge:
    1.024
    Zustimmungen:
    144
    Ortszeit:
    10:50
    Not everything needs to be sell in chest shop ever hear about making a sign describing it and selling it without the shop hehe
     
  14. Dat_Doc

    Dat_Doc Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    52
    Zustimmungen:
    4
    Ortszeit:
    19:50
    i feel we need market restrictions, because on the market players who just started can buy things that took me hours of work to get. I think this isnt fair for players that are already long on the server.
     
  15. julio1237878

    julio1237878 Game enthusiastic

    Beiträge:
    1.024
    Zustimmungen:
    144
    Ortszeit:
    10:50
    Again if they bought it don't worry they are the ones spoiling their fun :p
     
  16. alven4

    alven4 Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    449
    Zustimmungen:
    33
    Ortszeit:
    19:50
    I think there should be restriction on trading items giving players direct pvp advantage (heart canisters, armor, weapons...). If there weren't those restrictions the pvp aspect will be heavily imbalanced (trading KAMI items).
    And what will be even worse will be greater amount of players whining about getting one shotted outside their claims and losing their items when they first took agressive stance (Yes, this happened, even when there were no rules broken.).
     
  17. BookerTheGeek

    BookerTheGeek Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    3.257
    Zustimmungen:
    1.097
    Ortszeit:
    12:50
    Find this and I'll look into making it happen. It will need to support modded items with either the actual name, or a picture (Name is preferred). Also will need to support a blacklist.
     
  18. King_Cronus

    King_Cronus Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    842
    Zustimmungen:
    47
    Ortszeit:
    18:50
    Why work hard to achieve an item when u can buy it
     
  19. HomesliceMain

    HomesliceMain Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    74
    Zustimmungen:
    4
    Ortszeit:
    12:50
    I really feel like we don't need restrictions on the market
     
  20. OldManPingu

    OldManPingu Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    87
    Zustimmungen:
    17
    Ortszeit:
    18:50
    I must say I'm finding this interesting to see people's takes on it
     
    johnfg10 gefällt das.

Diese Seite empfehlen