1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Civilization 2.0 ?

Discussion in 'Community Talk' started by King_Cronus, Feb 20, 2016.

  1. King_Cronus

    King_Cronus Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    842
    Likes Received:
    47
    Local Time:
    7:37 PM

    Solution=don't use it
     
  2. Ash00182

    Ash00182 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,205
    Likes Received:
    378
    Local Time:
    7:37 PM
    Just going to input my two cents about this. In my opinion I believe civ is at a point where we should focus on maintaining the pack at its current state. This already calls for a lot of man power to do so. Adding mod after mod to the pack is just going to cause more issues that we don't really have, like lucid said, the support for atm.
     
  3. johnfg10

    johnfg10 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,430
    Likes Received:
    200
    Local Time:
    7:37 PM
  4. King_Cronus

    King_Cronus Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    842
    Likes Received:
    47
    Local Time:
    7:37 PM
    Sure i know u cannot let 30 people run the pack but allow the 30 people to sort the issues out my suggestion is that any crash that happens or if there is a bug that persist post it on the forums there might be someone that knows the solution
     
  5. johnfg10

    johnfg10 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,430
    Likes Received:
    200
    Local Time:
    7:37 PM
    u got any solutions drop me a msg il add it :D praticly 30 people manging the pack but only one actuly makes changes
     
  6. Ash00182

    Ash00182 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,205
    Likes Received:
    378
    Local Time:
    7:37 PM
    The "one" making changes wont be you because you dont have back-end access. Therefore you aren't really managing the pack.
     
  7. johnfg10

    johnfg10 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,430
    Likes Received:
    200
    Local Time:
    7:37 PM
    no but im doing some work for it in a fork whitch can then be put back into the pack by somone with back end access
     
  8. King_Cronus

    King_Cronus Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    842
    Likes Received:
    47
    Local Time:
    7:37 PM

    John i suggest u remake the pack and add some mods into it and add a sprinkle of fairy dust and call it civilization 2.0 offering the people a mod pack that can be managed by u someone who i know will look after this mod pack
     
  9. johnfg10

    johnfg10 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,430
    Likes Received:
    200
    Local Time:
    7:37 PM
    plus i have alot of time spare :D[DOUBLEPOST=1456055562][/DOUBLEPOST]also ive removed doggystyle as dogs no longer spawn on the sever due to tps issues also removed magnticraft looks cool but far to buggy finnaly i have removed flans because it is not used as a player starts to play the pack with in hours they realise flans weapons are rubbish il make a crossbow
     
  10. King_Cronus

    King_Cronus Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    842
    Likes Received:
    47
    Local Time:
    7:37 PM
    agreed this way the pack could really grow into something really nice i belive the solution to this mod pack would be either u making a new one to gain full and total control over it or to gain that control of it other wise its just rotting away[DOUBLEPOST=1456055703][/DOUBLEPOST]
    add ez storage
     
  11. johnfg10

    johnfg10 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,430
    Likes Received:
    200
    Local Time:
    7:37 PM
    ye atm im doing some testing with the current mods also i got a couple ideas with recipes to make the pack more concrete as it were
     
  12. King_Cronus

    King_Cronus Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    842
    Likes Received:
    47
    Local Time:
    7:37 PM
    should i change the title of the forum post to "civilization 2.0 ? "

    it may bring further constructive feed back
     
  13. johnfg10

    johnfg10 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,430
    Likes Received:
    200
    Local Time:
    7:37 PM
    il do some testing atleast :p[DOUBLEPOST=1456055853][/DOUBLEPOST]
    if u could
     
  14. SirStudMuffin

    SirStudMuffin Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,365
    Likes Received:
    337
    Local Time:
    7:37 PM
    Just please for the love of god make it habitable with FPS XD
     
  15. King_Cronus

    King_Cronus Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    842
    Likes Received:
    47
    Local Time:
    7:37 PM
    have u tried adding fast craft its not in the pack
     
  16. johnfg10

    johnfg10 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,430
    Likes Received:
    200
    Local Time:
    7:37 PM
    im not going to lie if my computer can handle it then so can most toasters[DOUBLEPOST=1456056205][/DOUBLEPOST]@bosslykpeter

    what is your resoning for Ezstorage is this the best we can fine to me it looks like a bad AE system ???
     
  17. SirStudMuffin

    SirStudMuffin Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,365
    Likes Received:
    337
    Local Time:
    7:37 PM
  18. johnfg10

    johnfg10 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,430
    Likes Received:
    200
    Local Time:
    7:37 PM
    oi how u get a picture of my computer :p
     
  19. King_Cronus

    King_Cronus Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    842
    Likes Received:
    47
    Local Time:
    7:37 PM
    its not a bad ae system its just a simple version of it there is no automation there for better for servers this pack would not benefit from ae i belive[DOUBLEPOST=1456056436][/DOUBLEPOST]
    nope optifine has mixed results fast craft as u may notice is in nearly every mod pack also try adding fps + mod
     
  20. johnfg10

    johnfg10 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,430
    Likes Received:
    200
    Local Time:
    7:37 PM
    so why add that over logictics pipes i can change/remove recipes for automation if i needed?[DOUBLEPOST=1456056621][/DOUBLEPOST]do we want
    Blood Arsenal?
     

Share This Page