Great reactor setup!

Dieses Thema im Forum "Tutorials, Tips and Tricks" wurde erstellt von mrminesheeps, 12. Juni 2016.

  1. Woops! Replied to the wrong post, sorry. Meant that the reactor design by OP is a lot complex and not very efficient.[DOUBLEPOST=1465812504][/DOUBLEPOST]Anyone can post a reactor design which can make ~10k RF and has decent efficiency? I'm tired of making fuel rods for the ic2 reactors. Playing infinity evolved, owner of a certus quartz wrench.[DOUBLEPOST=1465812777,1465812291][/DOUBLEPOST]
    Possibly none.
     
  2. BookerTheGeek

    BookerTheGeek Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    3.257
    Zustimmungen:
    1.097
    Ortszeit:
    23:24
    For active cooled? I run THIS at 36% insertion, It will run 8 turbines at 28.5 per turbine, nets about 228k per tick, uses an ingot every 173 seconds, so.... Almost a Million RF per ingot (788k per ingot)

    Passive cooled, I use THIS. The base formula for rod insertion is as follows:
    45% + (% of max power - 45) = Control rod insertion.
    Minimum Insertion is always 45%

    I'll also use THIS sometimes
     
    Zuletzt bearbeitet: 16. Juni 2016
  3. Mouro

    Mouro Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    1.583
    Zustimmungen:
    325
    Ortszeit:
    05:24
    link is totally wrong xD
     
  4. BookerTheGeek

    BookerTheGeek Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    3.257
    Zustimmungen:
    1.097
    Ortszeit:
    23:24
    fixed
     
  5. knoxz

    knoxz Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    612
    Zustimmungen:
    183
    Ortszeit:
    06:24
    your design is REALLY inefficient!
    Why would it be good at all?
    There are designs that give more than twice as much rf/ingot.
     
    profrags gefällt das.
  6. BookerTheGeek

    BookerTheGeek Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    3.257
    Zustimmungen:
    1.097
    Ortszeit:
    23:24
    Such as? realise those are only at 3 high.
     
  7. knoxz

    knoxz Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    612
    Zustimmungen:
    183
    Ortszeit:
    06:24
    the ones you posted are 3 times as efficient for example.
     
  8. BookerTheGeek

    BookerTheGeek Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    3.257
    Zustimmungen:
    1.097
    Ortszeit:
    23:24
    lol... I thought that
    Was about my design. oops
     
  9. mrminesheeps

    mrminesheeps Helper

    Beiträge:
    975
    Zustimmungen:
    237
    Ortszeit:
    21:24
    knoxz, am i getting the impression you were talking about my design? for it's purpose, it's pretty good. no need to act like some smart-alec. it was a good design for someone in my position, with limited supplies, and for the purpose it had.
     

Diese Seite empfehlen