Decided Against [IFSB] WilliTanks™

Dieses Thema im Forum "Archive (Suggestion and Feedback)" wurde erstellt von lryanle, 17. April 2016.

?

Should there be WillTanks™?

  1. Yes

  2. Yes

  3. Yes

  4. Yes

  5. Yes

  6. Yes

  7. No

  8. Yes

  9. Yes

  10. Yes

Eine Auswahl mehrerer Antworten ist erlaubt.
Das Ergebnis kann erst nach Abgabe einer Stimme betrachtet werden.
  1. Sandstroem

    Sandstroem Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    1.528
    Zustimmungen:
    821
    Ortszeit:
    14:14
    Thanks, I didn't even do the math, just put up some crucibles and it was fast enough. I use netherrack though which is 50% faster than lava underneath.
     
  2. julio1237878

    julio1237878 Game enthusiastic

    Beiträge:
    1.024
    Zustimmungen:
    144
    Ortszeit:
    05:14
    And if you want to go even faster blazing pyrothium is your choice
     
  3. lryanle

    lryanle Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    193
    Zustimmungen:
    81
    Ortszeit:
    07:14
    You also have to count that factor that you ahve to
    You also have to count that factor that you have to count the factor that you have to be in the same chunk for it to run at max speed, and the tps (Node one is at a steady 10, so its 50mb per second), also, if you aren't in the same chunks because you most likely have something to do, then you have to count the factor that it slows the machines down by 1/8 (From what a few people told me), which makes 6.75mb per second. that will take over a minute to make a bucket. It would be so much easier if there was a willitank, and if possible, a harder recipe for it.
     
  4. julio1237878

    julio1237878 Game enthusiastic

    Beiträge:
    1.024
    Zustimmungen:
    144
    Ortszeit:
    05:14
    I agree that i did't count factors.

    Now the Sirwill tank. in my book is a bit overpowered don't get me wrong i have use it in the pass and its one of those things that people can easily abuse. Like Sandstroem said you don't need 50 or 60 crucible to get a decent supply of obsidian going, in my island I only have 20 and it was going decently but as they say "To each their own"

    Also whats the purpose of the poll if every option is "yes"
     
  5. lryanle

    lryanle Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    193
    Zustimmungen:
    81
    Ortszeit:
    07:14
    First of all, there is one no option , and the style of the post was me being sarcastic if you couldn't tell :)

    Second of all, It could be abused, hence why I suggested a more complicated crafting recipe, but when you are getting the creative energy cell, you need quite a bit of draconium, cobalt, and ardite. Some people like me likes to mass produce everything, but when running on a potato, its not as simple as it sounds. From experience, i stayed at a stable 2 fps, using the tips to improve fps from mym, and still lagged at my old infinity evolved expert mode base. probably because of all the particles and the 500 filled mana pools, but anyways, i dont want to kill my frames, but i might try the 1 chunk LM base thing. Sorry for no grammar check, gotta head to bed now.
     
  6. julio1237878

    julio1237878 Game enthusiastic

    Beiträge:
    1.024
    Zustimmungen:
    144
    Ortszeit:
    05:14
    Hehe you aren't the only one running on a laptop powered by a potato. Atm I can't run any pack soo need to wait until summer to be able to build my own gaming pc :)
     
    profrags gefällt das.
  7. Sandstroem

    Sandstroem Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    1.528
    Zustimmungen:
    821
    Ortszeit:
    14:14
    You know that there are blocks called chunkloaders which make all your other chunks go the same speed?
     
    julio1237878 gefällt das.
  8. lryanle

    lryanle Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    193
    Zustimmungen:
    81
    Ortszeit:
    07:14
    I know, i said that in early posts.
     
  9. BookerTheGeek

    BookerTheGeek Patron Tier 3

    Beiträge:
    3.257
    Zustimmungen:
    1.097
    Ortszeit:
    07:14
    No.

    Feel free to continue to discuss the reasons as to why or why not it should have been added.
     
  10. Sandstroem

    Sandstroem Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    1.528
    Zustimmungen:
    821
    Ortszeit:
    14:14
    So why do you come up with the 1/8 math then? This is just pure theoretical if you are not able to put up a chunkloader.
     
  11. SirStudMuffin

    SirStudMuffin Well-Known Member

    Beiträge:
    2.365
    Zustimmungen:
    337
    Ortszeit:
    13:14
    I believe that would be me but the correct term before i downgraded by 2/3rds would be 27 sieves and 54 hammers
     

Diese Seite empfehlen